2017
DOI: 10.1057/s41261-017-0046-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of Islamic and conventional banks’ risk management practices: empirical evidence from Pakistan

Abstract: This paper investigates risk management practices of Islamic and conventional banks currently operating in the city of Lahore, Pakistan. Self-administered questionnaire is used to collect data from 150 bank senior managers and risk specialists with equal representation of the two banking categories. The study results reveal that risk identification, risk assessment and analysis, credit risk analysis and risk governance are the most efficient and influential variables in explaining the risk management practices… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study findings also relate to the importance of supervisors assessing the adequacy of a bank's liquidity risk management framework and its level of liquidity, and suggest steps that supervisors should take if these are deemed inadequate. This is in line with the study by [18].…”
Section: A) Assessment Of Fraud Risksupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The study findings also relate to the importance of supervisors assessing the adequacy of a bank's liquidity risk management framework and its level of liquidity, and suggest steps that supervisors should take if these are deemed inadequate. This is in line with the study by [18].…”
Section: A) Assessment Of Fraud Risksupporting
confidence: 93%
“…To collect its data, this study used a two-part questionnaire. It was adopted from an original developed by Al-Tamimi and Al-Mazrooei (2007), and has been updated and used by many other studies, such as Abul-Hassan (2009); Abu Hussain and Al-Ajmi (2012); Abdul Rahman et al (2014); Abbas et al (2018); Rehman et al (2018). Since so little data about RMPs have been published, the direct assessment of the views of key players in response to a questionnaire was thought to be a relevant way of capturing the dynamism of RMPs, given the main objective of the current study to assess and compare RMPs in IBs and CBs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Abdymomunov et al, (2017) financial institutions with a weak risk management procedure experience higher and more volatile operational losses whereas effective operational risk management is necessary for the success and existence of the bank, either Islamic or conventional, and its importance is increasing over time, particularly after the recent crises and the recession (Rehman, Benamraoui, & Dad, 2018). The associated losses related to this risk i:e operational risk range from rogue traders, fraud, settlement failure, poor accounting, miss selling and lapses in financial control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012;Rehman et al, 2018). It is therefore, vital for banks that operate complex businesses to establish efficient risk management processes in order to avoid heavy losses (Rehman et. al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%