2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-013-9430-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of iterative and non-iterative feature selection techniques for software defect prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…By statistical analysis, they proved that under-sampling was useful in improving the prediction performance of the classifiers trained afterward. Khoshgoftaar et al [36] discussed the effects of random sampling combined with other data preprocessing methods (including feature ranking). Their results also proved the effectiveness of random sampling in dealing with imbalanced datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By statistical analysis, they proved that under-sampling was useful in improving the prediction performance of the classifiers trained afterward. Khoshgoftaar et al [36] discussed the effects of random sampling combined with other data preprocessing methods (including feature ranking). Their results also proved the effectiveness of random sampling in dealing with imbalanced datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the purpose of the instance sampling was to reduce the total number of instances instead of handling class imbalance. Khoshgoftaar et al [36] combined filter-based feature ranking methods and random under-sampling. Their purpose was to use instance sampling for selecting features iteratively, but they did not train the classifier with balanced data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their experimental results demonstrate that with the deep exploration of concept associations and information integration, the detection of high-level concepts from video shots can be further improved by a non-trivial margin. Khoshgoftaar et al (2014) target the problem of feature selection in a high dimensional feature space and conduct a comparative study of various feature selection techniques for software defect prediction in their paper "A comparative study of iterative and non-iterative feature selection techniques for software defect prediction." In particular, they try to tackle the problems of feature selection and imbalanced training data concurrently by using an iterative feature selection approach that iteratively does data sampling (to address the class imbalance issue) and feature selection (to address the curse of dimensionality issue).…”
Section: About This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It predicts whether a new module has a faultprone based on the software metrics and historical defect information. These defect information can not only be used to guide the allocation of resources and repair software defects timely, but also can save the cost of software development and improve the quality of software [1][2][3]. There are many kinds of software metrics used for defect prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%