2007
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/34/8/s25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of jet-quenching schemes

Abstract: Abstract. The four major approximation schemes devised to study the modification of jets in dense matter are outlined. The comparisons are restricted to basic assumptions and approximations made in each case and the calculation methodology used. Emergent underlying similarities between apparently disparate methods brought about by the approximation schemes are exposed. Parameterizations of the medium in each scheme are discussed in terms of the transport coefficientq. Discrepancies between the estimates obtain… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gives the valueq ≈ 0.75 GeV 2 /fm for the values α s = 0.3 [16], C F = 9/4 [8,27] and L = n = 8.1 ± 0.05 [20]. This estimate ofq, which can be interpreted as a spacetime average, is comparable to the recent estimates of ∼ 1−2 GeV 2 /fm obtained from fits to hadron suppression data (for the most central Au+Au collisions) within the framework of the higher twist (HT) expansion [28,29] and the Gyulassy-Levai-Vitev (GLV) scheme [30,31]. It is, however, much less than the value recently extracted via the approach of Arnold, Moore and Yaffe (AMY) [16,32] and that of Armesto Salgado and Wiedemann (ASW) [16,33].…”
Section: Figs 2 (A) and (B) Show Plots Of Ln [Rsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This gives the valueq ≈ 0.75 GeV 2 /fm for the values α s = 0.3 [16], C F = 9/4 [8,27] and L = n = 8.1 ± 0.05 [20]. This estimate ofq, which can be interpreted as a spacetime average, is comparable to the recent estimates of ∼ 1−2 GeV 2 /fm obtained from fits to hadron suppression data (for the most central Au+Au collisions) within the framework of the higher twist (HT) expansion [28,29] and the Gyulassy-Levai-Vitev (GLV) scheme [30,31]. It is, however, much less than the value recently extracted via the approach of Arnold, Moore and Yaffe (AMY) [16,32] and that of Armesto Salgado and Wiedemann (ASW) [16,33].…”
Section: Figs 2 (A) and (B) Show Plots Of Ln [Rsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…[13,14]) could also play a role-in fact, collisional energy loss would correspond to non-eikonal (finite energy) corrections to the computed gluon radiation spectra. Also, several implementations of radiative energy loss computed, in particular, using different prescriptions to treat the medium averages exist [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only after the incorporation of the Landau-PomeranchukMigdal (LPM) type coherence effects in radiative energy loss calculations, for a brief overview of theoretical approaches see [4], and the clear prospects of hard physics at RHIC and the LHC significant progress in the field of jet tomography has been made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%