2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2004.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of laser-induced surface damage thresholds in BBO crystals and effect of impurities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Laser damage threshold values were found to be 0.1370, 0.0930, 0.0140, 0.4821, and 0.0232 GW cm −2 for COM‐1 to COM‐5 respectively. The laser damage threshold values of studied fluorophores were found to be higher than the reported value at 532 nm for β‐BBO crystals …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Laser damage threshold values were found to be 0.1370, 0.0930, 0.0140, 0.4821, and 0.0232 GW cm −2 for COM‐1 to COM‐5 respectively. The laser damage threshold values of studied fluorophores were found to be higher than the reported value at 532 nm for β‐BBO crystals …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Laser damage threshold values for 5a , 5b and 5c were found to be 4.60, 4.37, and 3.37 GW cm −2 , respectively. The values of laser damage threshold for the dyes when compared to the reported value of the standard inorganic material, β ‐BBO crystals at same specification were found to be several times higher than.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Laser damage threshold values were found to be 4.67 GW cm −2 for 2 c (radius, r=82.395 x 10 −6 m, Energy, E=4.975 mJ) and 4.19 GW cm −2 (Radius, r=84.455 x 10 −6 m, Energy, E=4.689 mJ) for 2 a . The LDT of the molecules studied are better than that of β‐BBO crystals, the reported standard inorganic reference material at the same specification …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%