2011
DOI: 10.15373/2249555x/jan2014/101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Life Time Models in the Analysis of Survival Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sharma et al (2019), pointed out in their study to compare the efficiency of some accelerated failure time models (lognormal, exponential, log-logistic, and weibull) AIC was calculated and Weibull model found to be the best for the breast cancer data set, which is consistent with our findings where the weibull was the best fitted model among the models considered Vallinayagam et al (2014). compared the performance of some parametric models including log-logistic, gompertz, exponential lognormal and weibull for Breast cancer data set.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Sharma et al (2019), pointed out in their study to compare the efficiency of some accelerated failure time models (lognormal, exponential, log-logistic, and weibull) AIC was calculated and Weibull model found to be the best for the breast cancer data set, which is consistent with our findings where the weibull was the best fitted model among the models considered Vallinayagam et al (2014). compared the performance of some parametric models including log-logistic, gompertz, exponential lognormal and weibull for Breast cancer data set.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The log‐Normal distribution is adopted, which is popular in published studies (Klein & Moeschberger, 2003; Shokoohi et al., 2019). It has been observed that for many diseases including breast cancer (Vallinayagam et al., 2014) and NSCLC (Claret et al., 2018), the log‐Normal distribution fits better than other parametric models. In addition, we can specify conjugate priors for log‐Normal distribution, drastically simplifying estimation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst the parametric survival models, Lognormal has been selected as the best fitting model for cancer data (Vallinayagam et al, 2014;Mohseny et al, 2017). Awodutire et al (2017) used parametric survival models to investigate the survival times of the Nigerian cancer data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%