A Comparative Study of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles’ Local and Systemic Dose-Dependent Administration in Rat Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a serious neurological condition that causes severe disability. One of the approaches to overcoming the complications of SCI is stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle (EV) therapy. In this research, we performed a comparative evaluation of rat spinal cord post-traumatic regeneration efficacy using different methods of mesenchymal stem cell-derived EV transplantation (local vs. systemic) followed by evaluation of their minimal therapeutic dose. The results suggested that MSC-EV therapy could improve locomotor activity over 60 days after the SCI, showing a dose-dependent effect on the recovery of spinal cord motor pathways. We also established the possibility of maintaining a population of mature oligodendrocytes by MSC-EVs. It was observed that in the spinal cord injury area, intravenous transplantation of MSC-EVs showed more pronounced therapeutic effects compared to the treatment of fibrin matrix-encapsulated MSC-EVs.

The Impact of Treadmill Training on Tissue Integrity, Axon Growth, and Astrocyte Modulation

“…Electrical stimulation used single rectangular pulses (0.2 ms). For motor evoked potentials, transcranial stimulation was applied with needle electrodes penetrating subcutaneously into the skull, using pulses of 0.04 to 0.1 ms and intensities between 20 and 500 V; more details were described in previous studies [64,65].…”

Electrophysiology Methods for Assessing of Neurodegenerative and Post-Traumatic Processes as Applied to Translational Research

“…However, for model animals with SCI, the registration of these parameters is essential. Observations have shown an increase in M-wave amplitude alongside a decrease in the H-reflex [ 165 , 166 ].…”

Intrathecal Injection of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem-Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Spinal Cord Injury: A Feasibility Study in Pigs

“…The animal's neuromotor function was assessed by stimulating electromyography as previously described before the injury [50,52], and at 6 and 22 weeks after the SCI . M-waves were recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle in response to a stimulation of the sciatic nerve.…”

“…Immunofluorescence reactions were conducted in a standard way [52]. The sections were incubated with primary and secondary antibodies to identify the antigen: P0 (Santa Cruz, 1:50), CD31 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, 1:100), donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555 (Abcam, 1:200), and donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 647 (Abcam, 1:200).…”