2008 International Conference on Electronic Design 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iced.2008.4786656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of missing value estimation methods: Which method performs better?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[31,32] . There are three common ways to deal with missing values: use the feature that contains the missing value directly, delete the feature that contains the missing value (this only works if the feature contains blank values in a big number), and complete the missing value [33,34] . Because there are a small number of blank values in the raw Dataset, the features containing blank values are employed in this paper to process blank values.…”
Section: Data Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31,32] . There are three common ways to deal with missing values: use the feature that contains the missing value directly, delete the feature that contains the missing value (this only works if the feature contains blank values in a big number), and complete the missing value [33,34] . Because there are a small number of blank values in the raw Dataset, the features containing blank values are employed in this paper to process blank values.…”
Section: Data Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BPCA technique used in that study (i.e., Oba et al 2003) for missing data preprocessing was found to be quite good even when 40% of data were missing, surpassing the performance of the models on the basis of k-nearest neighbors (kNN) and singular value decomposition (SVD). The tool was also used by Lim and Zainuddin (2008), which compared the BPCA with the local least square imputation (LLS) and the radial basis function (RBF) network. They concluded that BPCA had the best results according to the normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) criterion, and the LLS produced competitive results when compared with BPCA, followed by RBF, which had the lowest performance.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%