2015
DOI: 10.3390/a8030723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Modern Heuristics on the School Timetabling Problem

Abstract: Abstract:In this contribution a comparative study of modern heuristics on the school timetabling problem is presented. More precisely, we investigate the application of two population-based algorithms, namely a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and an Artificial Fish Swarm (AFS), on the high school timetabling problem. In order to demonstrate their efficiency and performance, experiments with real-world input data have been performed. Both algorithms proposed manage to create feasible and efficient high school… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Step II: main model is solved lecturers' preferences as well as their rank and saturation margins. Some revised works deal either with the same problem type (L-S) such as Hultberg and Cardoso (1997) or include it in a broader one: L-S-T-C such as Badri (1996), Badri et al (1998), Al-Yakoob andSherali (2006), Skoullis et al (2017) or L-S-T, such as Ismayilova et al (2007), Tassopoulos and Beligiannis (2012), Katsaragakis et al (2015), Fonseca et al (2017) and Tassopoulos et al (2020). However, as justified below, these works do not address some of the peculiarities of the problem under study.…”
Section: Our Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step II: main model is solved lecturers' preferences as well as their rank and saturation margins. Some revised works deal either with the same problem type (L-S) such as Hultberg and Cardoso (1997) or include it in a broader one: L-S-T-C such as Badri (1996), Badri et al (1998), Al-Yakoob andSherali (2006), Skoullis et al (2017) or L-S-T, such as Ismayilova et al (2007), Tassopoulos and Beligiannis (2012), Katsaragakis et al (2015), Fonseca et al (2017) and Tassopoulos et al (2020). However, as justified below, these works do not address some of the peculiarities of the problem under study.…”
Section: Our Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estas definiciones generales permiten entender que la organización de horarios se aplica a una gran cantidad de contextos que abarcan la educación, la industria, el deporte, la salud, entre otros, y por tanto el interés en encontrar la mejor forma de hacerlo sobrepasa los fines académicos de las ciencias. Además, en este tipo de problemas es común encontrar restricciones de obligatorio cumplimento, así como condiciones que pueden ser quebrantadas sin que la solución pierda factibilidad ni validez [7]; a estas restricciones se les conoce como duras y blandas respectivamente.…”
Section: Revisión De La Literaturaunclassified
“…The first kind of constraints, as its name implies, is used for representing the constraints in which a feasible timetable must be satisfied (Henry Obit, 2010). Meanwhile, the second kind of constraints stands for the constraints that a feasible timetable could be violated (Katsaragakis et al, 2015). This kind of constraints is utilized to measure the quality of a timetable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%