2014
DOI: 10.3390/ijms150915044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Non-Viral Gene Delivery Techniques to Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell

Abstract: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold tremendous potential for therapeutic use in stem cell-based gene therapy. Ex vivo genetic modification of MSCs with beneficial genes of interest is a prerequisite for successful use of stem cell-based therapeutic applications. However, genetic manipulation of MSCs is challenging because they are resistant to commonly used methods to introduce exogenous DNA or RNA. Herein we compared the effectiveness of several techniques (classic calcium phosphate precipitation, cationic pol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially, Abdul Halim et al compared the transfection efficiencies of several methods (calcium phosphate precipitation, cationic liposome, electroporation, and microporation) in hAT-MSCs and found that only microporation generated 50% GFP þ MSCs whereas with the others made less than 1% of MSCs were produced in the display of GFP fluorescence [23], which is in accord with our result whereby microporation was much more efficient for MSC transfection than the cationic liposome method (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Especially, Abdul Halim et al compared the transfection efficiencies of several methods (calcium phosphate precipitation, cationic liposome, electroporation, and microporation) in hAT-MSCs and found that only microporation generated 50% GFP þ MSCs whereas with the others made less than 1% of MSCs were produced in the display of GFP fluorescence [23], which is in accord with our result whereby microporation was much more efficient for MSC transfection than the cationic liposome method (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…2). Many studies have already reported that MSCs are resistant to plasmid transfection by the cationic liposome method [21,23,38,39]. In the case of minicircle, the cationic liposome method also seemed to be also inefficient although it showed higher transfection efficiency compared with only plasmid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are other more frequent methods to introduce foreign DNA into the nucleus of a cell, such as physical treatment (electroporation) [55], chemical carriers (cationic lipids) [56], or biological particles (viruses) as carriers [10]. These methods, especially for the viral carriers, have good transfection efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Emerging potential of gene silencing approaches targeting anti-chondrogenic factors for cell-… this choice may be convenient for engineered cells to prime the regeneration process by triggering repair mechanisms as well as to stimulate an active involvement of the host tissues in the repair of the defect [30]. Transient techniques for gene silencing are receiving an increasing amount of interest, since the progress in RNAi techniques has led to the development and optimization of cell transfection in 3D microenvironment, with exogenous scaffolds being able to greatly increase efficiency and durability of gene silencing [29].…”
Section: Gene Silencing For Chondrogenesis: Potentialities and Challementioning
confidence: 99%