2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of nonlinear aeroelastic models for high aspect ratio wings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We begin validating the gust input system as well as the the aeroelastic dynamic solvers by comparing the dynamic response of the clamped aircraft for a range of 1-cos gusts with small intensities. As per CS-25 and FAR regulations, gust lengths must be within the range (in meters) of ∈ [18,214]. Based on this, four types of gusts are selected, with the following gust lengths, [1 : 18 ; 2 : 67 ; 3 : 116 ; 4 : 214 ], gust intensity of 0 = 0.01 in Eq.…”
Section: Gust Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We begin validating the gust input system as well as the the aeroelastic dynamic solvers by comparing the dynamic response of the clamped aircraft for a range of 1-cos gusts with small intensities. As per CS-25 and FAR regulations, gust lengths must be within the range (in meters) of ∈ [18,214]. Based on this, four types of gusts are selected, with the following gust lengths, [1 : 18 ; 2 : 67 ; 3 : 116 ; 4 : 214 ], gust intensity of 0 = 0.01 in Eq.…”
Section: Gust Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, only quadratic terms of the main variables are needed to capture the complete space of geometric nonlinearities. As for the modelling of the aerodynamic forces, although 2-D airfoil unsteady aerodynamics are still often used for high-aspect-ratio wing aeroelasticity, 3-D effects have been shown to play an important role [18] and will be considered here. The aerodynamic forces are obtained from the Doublet-Lattice Method (DLM) [19,20], which solves a linearization of the compressible, inviscid, unsteady flow equations in the 3-dimensional domain, and it is commonly used in linear aircraft aeroelastic analysis [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspect-ratio increase is usually achieved by a compromise in chord reduction and span increase that enables aerodynamic advantages at typical operating conditions, namely in cruise and high g's maneuvers, without a severe increase of the structural weight. This design solution has however an impact on the wing's structure which is now more prone to higher deflections and root bending moments with the increase of wing span, which may result in geometric nonlinearities [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Hazardous aeroelastic phenomena such as flutter may arise from this higher flexibility in the flight envelope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a simple yet realistic model and analysis framework that can accurately assess the flight performances of a largely deformed highly flexible aircraft, and can fully account for the coupling between flight dynamics and both structural nonlinearity and unsteady aerodynamics, which play a key role in the vehicle's static and dynamic characteristics, are of paramount importance in the analysis and design of these highly flexible aircrafts [3][4][5]. Such models are typically built using nonlinear beam representations of the structure [6][7][8], with either unsteady strip theory [9][10][11][12][13] or unsteady vortex lattice aerodynamics [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%