2010
DOI: 10.5121/ijwest.2010.1301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Ontology building Tools in Semantic Web Applications

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For Semantic Web an efficient ontology represents an important aspect. Kapoor & et al [2] describes different types of ontology management tools like Protege, Apollo, IsaViz, Swoop etc. They gave a comparative study of these tools in their paper [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Semantic Web an efficient ontology represents an important aspect. Kapoor & et al [2] describes different types of ontology management tools like Protege, Apollo, IsaViz, Swoop etc. They gave a comparative study of these tools in their paper [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kapoor & et al [2] describes different types of ontology management tools like Protege, Apollo, IsaViz, Swoop etc. They gave a comparative study of these tools in their paper [2]. At present OWL is most popular to use for ontology development, but to achieve the goal of the Linked Data RDF is enough and quite efficient for now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the object of conceptualization the ontologies are classified into four categories shown in Fig.1 and are discussed below [3,5]. For example one of the most cited ontologies is the wine ontology.…”
Section: A Classification Of Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontology building tools [13] ii) Web Ontology Language (OWL) A language derived from description logics which offer more detailed ontology constructs over RDFS is OWL. It is syntactically embedded into RDF, so like RDFS, it provides additional standardized vocabulary.…”
Section: Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%