Background: Hemorrhoidectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with third-degree or fourth-degree hemorrhoids.
This prospective randomized clinical study compared the outcome of surgical haemorrhoidectomy by open and closed
techniques in terms of postoperative pain, postoperative complications, and wound healing. Patients and Methods: This study included 60
patients who underwent haemorrhoidectomy at Surgery Department of KATURI MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL. The participants were
divided into two groups: Group 1: Open haemorrhoidectomy, Group 2: Closed haemorrhoidectomy. In bot Results: h close & open procedures, no
patient was pain free. However, Post-operative pain scores were signicantly low in the closed Group than open Group during rst 24 hours. In
terms of postoperative complications, there was no statistical difference between the two procedures. Length of hospital stay, and faster wound
healing time were better in closed group. Both the open and closed approaches are Conclusion: less expensive, safe, simple to use, and yield
positive outcomes. We discovered that Ferguson's closed approach had signicant advantages over Morgan's open approach