2009
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsp157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of optimization methods and conventional methods for sampling design in fishery-independent surveys

Abstract: Liu, Y., Chen, Y., and Cheng, J. 2009. A comparative study of optimization methods and conventional methods for sampling design in fishery-independent surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 1873–1882. We have introduced and evaluated a procedure, the constrained spatial simulated annealing method, for developing an optimal sampling design for fishery-independent surveys. We used two criterion functions, minimization of the mean of the shortest distance (MMSD) and uniform distribution of point pairs for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous studies which suggest that SYS tends to be more accurate than stratified random design (Cochran, 2007;Ripley, 2004). The desirable properties of SYS generally embodies in providing better support for kriging methods which aim to obtain estimates of spatial distribution (Liu et al, 2009). In this study, SYS was demonstrated to out-perform random and stratified random designs for estimating the population mean in terms of precision and efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with previous studies which suggest that SYS tends to be more accurate than stratified random design (Cochran, 2007;Ripley, 2004). The desirable properties of SYS generally embodies in providing better support for kriging methods which aim to obtain estimates of spatial distribution (Liu et al, 2009). In this study, SYS was demonstrated to out-perform random and stratified random designs for estimating the population mean in terms of precision and efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Scientific sampling designs help scientists to have a representative view of target population with limited efforts. In fisheries, because of different characteristics of target species (e.g., spatial structure) and objectives of sampling (e.g., estimators), different sampling designs are required to gain maximal efficiency (Liu et al, 2009;Simmonds and Fryer, 1996;Wang et al, 2009). Of the sampling designs, simple random sample without replacement (SRS) is more commonly used as a null design for comparing the efficiency (relative variance) of different sampling schemes than as an optimal practical fishery survey design (Pooler and Smith, 2005;Skibo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among all these available criteria, the MMSD is optimal for its flexibility to handle fixed samples, constraints and weights. Thus, the SSA + MMSD is the best method for generating even sampling designs and has received extremely wide applications (van Groenigen et al 2000a, b;Tapia 2004;Debba et al 2005Debba et al , 2008Tapia et al 2005;Debba 2006;Simbahan and Dobermann 2006;Zhao et al 2008;Liu et al 2009). Different defects, however, exist within these methods as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to Liu et al [14], stratified design may not be the best for a fisheryindependent survey under some special conditions. Our results suggest that sampling design based on the criterion of minimization of the mean of the shortest distance (MMSD) [15] was the best [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%