2012
DOI: 10.1515/1557-4679.1389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Parametric and Nonparametric Estimates of the Attributable Fraction for a Semi-continuous Exposure

Abstract: The attributable fraction of a disease due to an exposure is the fraction of disease cases in a population that can be attributed to that exposure. We consider the attributable fraction for a semicontinuous exposure, that is an exposure for which a clump of people have zero exposure and the rest of the people have a continuously distributed positive exposure. Estimation of the attributable fraction involves estimating the conditional probability of having the disease given the exposure. Three main approaches t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The branches of robust and nonparametric statistics deal with distribution selection problems. Nonparametric methods to estimate attributable fractions in cohort and case-control studies have been proposed (Wang and Small, 2012;Hanley, 2001;Chen et al, 2010;Sjölander and Vansteelandt, 2017;Taguri et al, 2012). In particular, Sjölander (2011); Taguri et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The branches of robust and nonparametric statistics deal with distribution selection problems. Nonparametric methods to estimate attributable fractions in cohort and case-control studies have been proposed (Wang and Small, 2012;Hanley, 2001;Chen et al, 2010;Sjölander and Vansteelandt, 2017;Taguri et al, 2012). In particular, Sjölander (2011); Taguri et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where E obs X RR(X; β) represents the expected value of the relative risk under the observed exposure distribution in a given population and E cft X RR(X; β) is the expected value of the relative risk under a counterfactual distribution of the exposure (Taguri et al, 2012;Wang and Small, 2012).…”
Section: Potential Impact Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is an indicator function [ 18 ]. Justification of the convergence of the estimate ( 6 ) to the PAF in ( 5 ) is provided by [ 6 ] in the scenario of no other covariates. A similar proof adjusting for the X can also be derived.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the definition of the PAF itself also suggests a monotone relationship between the disease risk and the exposure level (a justification is presented at the end of the next section). Incorporating the monotonicity assumption into the estimation of the PAF provides performance gains when there are no other covariates [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slightly more complicated model that was preferred by Smith et al (1994) adds an additional power parameter to the logistic regression. Also, nonparametric regression models can be considered such as local linear smoothing (Wang & Small 2012). However, if data are collected from a case-control study and the prevalence of fever is not known, then P (Y obs = 1|D) cannot be fully estimated, but p f and p a can be estimated.…”
Section: Additional Assumptions Needed For Existing Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%