“…Comparison of the two methods was not the object of this study. Comparing PT7 and laboratory blood-gas analysis results is difficult because laboratory blood-gas analysis measurement is fraught with a variety of problems: samples for blood-gas analysis may easily be handled incorrectly by sample dilution, excess heparinized saline, 20 21 delays in analysis with the sample being stored at room temperature, 20 22 oxygen consumption from metabolism by leucocytes and other cells contained in the sample, 23 diffusion of gases through the plastic wall of syringes [24][25][26] and pressure of air bubbles in the samples, 22 26 27 particularly during transport. 28 In addition, the accuracy and variability of laboratory blood-gas analysers are applied in a recent evaluation of blood-gas analysers 29 : in the PO 2 range of 4-20 kPa and PCO 2 range of 2.7-10.6 kPa, respectively, 95% of measurements should be within Ϯ7.5% or Ϯ0.6 kPa of a reference; for PO 2 920 kPa and PCO 2 910.6 kPa, respectively, 95% of measurements should be within Ϯ12.5% of a reference; pH accuracy cannot be tested because there is no reference method.…”