A comparative study of reciprocity in international physician licensing

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the international mobility of physicians by comparing the regulations governing the practice of foreign physicians in the USA and eight other countries. Design/methodology/approach – This is a comparative study of the regulations governing the practice of foreign physicians in eight countries: China, India, the Philippines, the UK, Germany, Denmark, Israel and Australia. Their requirements are then contrasted with the USA’s requirements for foreign physician licensure to evaluate the extent of reciprocity among these countries. We conclude the paper by outlining some recommendations to increase the international mobility of physicians in the future. Findings – The results indicate that licensure for US physicians to practice in the nations above ranges from impossible (India), to difficult (China), to moderately difficult (the UK, Germany and Denmark), to easy and completely reciprocal (Australia, Israel and the Philippines). Originality/value – The results and recommendations in this study are a valuable starting point for further research and policy changes that will ensure a more reciprocal relationship between the USA and other countries, in terms of opportunities for international medical practice.

Challenges for international medical graduates in the US and the UK graduate medical education and health care system environment: A comprehensive review

“…Academic institutions, professional groups, and governmental agencies have distinct responsibilities in providing assistance and advocating for the interests of IMG. In the United States, ECFMG and in the United Kingdom, GMC provide guidelines on licensing, certification, and residency training requirements for IMG [11]. Organizations such as the AMA and BMA work actively to promote legislation that meets the needs and challenges encountered by IMGs in healthcare settings [11].…”

“…In the United States, ECFMG and in the United Kingdom, GMC provide guidelines on licensing, certification, and residency training requirements for IMG [11]. Organizations such as the AMA and BMA work actively to promote legislation that meets the needs and challenges encountered by IMGs in healthcare settings [11].…”

“…Healthcare stakeholders may discover ways of assessing the effects of these programs. Develop measures to enhance the assimilation and welfare of IMG in healthcare systems in the United States and the United Kingdom [11].…”