2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of silicon surface passivation using ethanolic iodine and bromine solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the value obtained by Sinton lifetime tester if the injection levels are taken in consideration (Table-1). Similar observation has been made in [5]. A typical lifetime map of bare and Al 2 O 3 passivated silicon wafer is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…the value obtained by Sinton lifetime tester if the injection levels are taken in consideration (Table-1). Similar observation has been made in [5]. A typical lifetime map of bare and Al 2 O 3 passivated silicon wafer is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The first strategy is based on the reduction of the density of electronic states at the surface and the second is based on significant reduction of one type of charge (electron/hole) carrier from the surface by an internal electric field. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The interface defect density can be reduced by chemical route where atomic hydrogen or a halogen atom is, generally, attached with the unsaturated Si (dangling) bonds. Consequently surface is passivated 11 and this process is referred as chemical passivation.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the measured t eff by the WCT-120 and the mW-PCD could be compared at the same injection levels. 31 The metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) structure (schematic of which is given in Fig. 1) is fabricated by depositing aluminum dots (area B0.02 cm 2 ) using an e-beam evaporation system …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%