2014 12th International Conference on Actual Problems of Electronics Instrument Engineering (APEIE) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/apeie.2014.7040781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of speed control based on MPC and PI-controller for Indirect Field oriented control of induction motor drive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where , and . and the actual currents , and have been inputs to hysteresis comparator [37,38]. The electromagnetic torque is defined as [9]:…”
Section: Vector Control On Induction Motormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where , and . and the actual currents , and have been inputs to hysteresis comparator [37,38]. The electromagnetic torque is defined as [9]:…”
Section: Vector Control On Induction Motormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers of [25] compared FCS-MPC with a PI-PWM control scheme, proving that although the tuning of the MPC was easier, it gave an 80% higher average phase current ripple and up to 20% for flux/torque control. Other authors [26] have performed a comparison of CCS-MPC with a conventional PI in a simulation that resulted in the better robustness of the MPC against a load disturbance. Some improvements in FCS-MPC have been achieved in [27,28], where partition optimization and a predictive strategy that reduced the common-mode voltage at the machine terminals were used, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%