2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the response of buried pipes under static and moving loads

Abstract: Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. • Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. • Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been some prior works in the literature that studied the vehicle load effect on buried water pipes, pipes that serve other utilities (such as gas transmission), or other underground structures (such as culverts). Alzabeebee et al [11] summarized several studies that investigated differences in the effect of moving and static traffic loads on buried infrastructure (pipes, culverts etc.). Of these studies, some conducted on-site experiments, some performed numerical simulation [12][13][14][15], and some adopted both approaches [16].…”
Section: Literature Review and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some prior works in the literature that studied the vehicle load effect on buried water pipes, pipes that serve other utilities (such as gas transmission), or other underground structures (such as culverts). Alzabeebee et al [11] summarized several studies that investigated differences in the effect of moving and static traffic loads on buried infrastructure (pipes, culverts etc.). Of these studies, some conducted on-site experiments, some performed numerical simulation [12][13][14][15], and some adopted both approaches [16].…”
Section: Literature Review and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al [32] assessed the effects of local random pitting on the collapse pressure of 2D ring under external pressure. Alzabeebee et al [33] used numerical modelling to determine the minimum wall thickness on different pipe diameters by means of design performance parameters.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript N O T C O P Y E D I T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topic described in the paper is very important due to the fact that in recent years, research and analysis of culverts under various types of loads are still being carried out. This is related to both culverts in situ tests 1 4 , as well as numerical analysis of different load cases 5 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%