1984
DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.49.537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the chromosomes in 5 species of birds from the genus Aratinga (Psittaciformes: Aves).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The karyotypes of these two Anodorhynchus species are similar to those described for members of the genera Cyanopsitta, Propyrrhura, Aratinga, Pionites, Pionopsitta, Nandayus and Guaruba, distinguished by a conserved metacentric pair 1, pairs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 varying from submetacentric to subtelocentric, pairs 7 and 8 varying from metacentric to submetacentric, and pairs 9, 10 and 11 varying from metacentric to telocentric (De Lucca, 1984;Van Dongen and De Boer, 1984;De Lucca et al, 1991;Duarte and Giannoni, 1990;Goldschmidt et al, 1997;Lunardi et al, 2003). The maintenance of the diploid number among these genera and the occurrence of variation of the centromeric position of the macrochromosomes suggests that in this group the main evolutionary mechanisms for karyotypic differentiation were inversions and/or translocations (De Lucca et al, 1991).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…The karyotypes of these two Anodorhynchus species are similar to those described for members of the genera Cyanopsitta, Propyrrhura, Aratinga, Pionites, Pionopsitta, Nandayus and Guaruba, distinguished by a conserved metacentric pair 1, pairs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 varying from submetacentric to subtelocentric, pairs 7 and 8 varying from metacentric to submetacentric, and pairs 9, 10 and 11 varying from metacentric to telocentric (De Lucca, 1984;Van Dongen and De Boer, 1984;De Lucca et al, 1991;Duarte and Giannoni, 1990;Goldschmidt et al, 1997;Lunardi et al, 2003). The maintenance of the diploid number among these genera and the occurrence of variation of the centromeric position of the macrochromosomes suggests that in this group the main evolutionary mechanisms for karyotypic differentiation were inversions and/or translocations (De Lucca et al, 1991).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, both short-tailed species here studied, P leucogaster and P pileata, presented the karyotypic pattern observed for long-tailed species from Ara, Aratinga, Guaruba, Nandayus, Cyanopsitta and Propyhrrura genera (Lucca 1984, Duarte and Giannoni 1990, Lucca et al 1991, Goldschmidt et al 1997 Jr. in press. ).…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…Generally, where structural differences in karyotypes exist between various species of a group it is possible to form hypotheses as to their phylogenetic relationships (Van Dongen and De Boer, 1984). The American parrots is one of the most cytogenetically studied groups of New World birds (Lucca, 1974(Lucca, , 1984(Lucca, , 1985De Boer and Belterman, 1980;Van Dongen and De Boer, 1984;Schmutz and Prus, 1987;Valentine, 1987;Ferrari, 1985, 1990;Duarte and Giannoni, 1990;Lucca et al, 1991;Archangelo et al, 1995;Duarte and Caparroz, 1995;Rocha et al, 1995;Goldschmidt et al, 1997;Francisco et al, 2001;Lunardi et al, 2003), the species so far analyzed exhibiting a heterogeneous karyotypic morphology among some genera in contrast with several other avian groups in which very uniform karyotypes are found. Duarte and Caparroz (1995) showed that the Yellow-faced parrot (Amazona xanthops Spix, 1824), a species endemic to eastern and central Brazil (Forshaw, 1989), exhibited large karyotypic differences not only with the other species of the genus Amazona but also all the other New World parrots that have so far been described, while the morphological analysis conducted by Sick (1984) led him to state that the`inclusion of (A. xanthops) in the Amazona genus may not be correct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%