2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32790-2_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of the Impact of Statistical and Semantic Features in the Framework of Extractive Text Summarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lloret et al [7] reported on significant increase in ROUGE-1 values over the TF baseline when TE was used to identify the redundant information in a text. Similarly, Vodolazova et al [8] report that the best results are obtained when TE is included into the process of summary generation.…”
Section: Textual Entailmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Lloret et al [7] reported on significant increase in ROUGE-1 values over the TF baseline when TE was used to identify the redundant information in a text. Similarly, Vodolazova et al [8] report that the best results are obtained when TE is included into the process of summary generation.…”
Section: Textual Entailmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, not all the systems equally benefit from including AR method. Vodolazova et al [8] integrated JavaRAP [9] to substitute anaphoric expressions by their antecedents and reported that AR per se decreases the quality of final summaries. But applying AR to the original text data prior to redundancy detection carried out using of textual entailment was shown to improve the quality of final summaries as compared to the system using AR or TE only.…”
Section: Anaphora Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations