2007
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the efficacy of topical negative pressure moist dressings and conventional moist dressings in chronic wounds

Abstract: Aim: To assess the efficacy of topical negative pressure moist wound dressing as compared to conventional moist wound dressings in improving the healing process in chronic wounds and to prove that negative pressure dressings can be used as a much better treatment option in the management of chronic wounds. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective comparative study of data from 112 patients with chronic wounds, of which 56 patients underwent topical negative pressure dressings (17 diabetic, 10 pressure s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean graft uptake was 60.45±19.34 in the group which underwent conventional moist wound dressings. 9 In a study conducted by Younes et al published in 2006 at University of Jordan, first dressing change following split-thickness skin grafting was done on postoperative day 3. The graft take was declared as successful when the grafted skin attached completely and epithelization was apparent by inspection at the edges .The graft take was 100% in 12 of the 16 patients.…”
Section: Graft Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean graft uptake was 60.45±19.34 in the group which underwent conventional moist wound dressings. 9 In a study conducted by Younes et al published in 2006 at University of Jordan, first dressing change following split-thickness skin grafting was done on postoperative day 3. The graft take was declared as successful when the grafted skin attached completely and epithelization was apparent by inspection at the edges .The graft take was 100% in 12 of the 16 patients.…”
Section: Graft Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%