2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2014.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the organization of alternative transport in the cities of Rio de Janeiro and Dakar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While not within the scope of this research, these aspects of Clandos' activity require further study. Other further research could compare Clandos and other public transport modes in terms of quality of service, which is often poor in Dakar, both in vehicles at stops and interchange stations [43,50]. Different methods could be used, with the help of mystery shoppers [51] or specific user surveys [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not within the scope of this research, these aspects of Clandos' activity require further study. Other further research could compare Clandos and other public transport modes in terms of quality of service, which is often poor in Dakar, both in vehicles at stops and interchange stations [43,50]. Different methods could be used, with the help of mystery shoppers [51] or specific user surveys [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples in the literature describe the formalization and consolidation of fragmented systems, particularly those in developing cities, into more cohesive, planned networks (Ferro and Behrens 2015; Jaramillo, Lizárraga, and Grindlay 2012; Pucher et al 2005). Collaboration of small independent providers into cooperatives is an alternative reform strategy, though competitive forces can limit reform outcomes (Filho, Ribeiro, and Thiam 2015, 283). In some cases, formalization of previously fragmented demand-oriented systems into “modern” formalized networks may reduce mobility for some users, as the system becomes inherently less flexible and less able to rapidly meet changing demand patterns (Ferro and Behrens 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%