1992
DOI: 10.4044/joma1947.104.3-4_365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the lumbrical muscles in the hand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our studies show that the insertion-patterns of the lumbrical muscles are quite similar in the human hand and foot. We have also studied the hands or forepaws of the kangaroo, dog, cat and monkey, and suggested that the lumbrical muscles in the hands are originally bipennate muscles, which are inserted by two (medial and lateral) tails into the bases of the proximal phalanges of the contiguous fingers (Ikebuchi, 1992). Namely, we have indicated that in the phylogenetic development, the lumbrical muscles lose their lateral tails (or solely remain their medial tails) and also move (or transfer) their insertions from the proximal phalanges to the dorsal aponeuroses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, our studies show that the insertion-patterns of the lumbrical muscles are quite similar in the human hand and foot. We have also studied the hands or forepaws of the kangaroo, dog, cat and monkey, and suggested that the lumbrical muscles in the hands are originally bipennate muscles, which are inserted by two (medial and lateral) tails into the bases of the proximal phalanges of the contiguous fingers (Ikebuchi, 1992). Namely, we have indicated that in the phylogenetic development, the lumbrical muscles lose their lateral tails (or solely remain their medial tails) and also move (or transfer) their insertions from the proximal phalanges to the dorsal aponeuroses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%