2006
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-005-9033-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the durability and behaviour of fat lime and feebly-hydraulic lime mortars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), which complicates the classification of degradation processes [17,18]. The combined action of temperature and water is one of the most common degradation mechanisms in renders, contributing to cracking due to temperature variation and easier water absorption [19]. Water promotes the action of relevant agents, such as freeze-thaw, salts crystallisation and various biological agents.…”
Section: Degradation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), which complicates the classification of degradation processes [17,18]. The combined action of temperature and water is one of the most common degradation mechanisms in renders, contributing to cracking due to temperature variation and easier water absorption [19]. Water promotes the action of relevant agents, such as freeze-thaw, salts crystallisation and various biological agents.…”
Section: Degradation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrated calcic lime (EN 459-1 standard) has been chosen instead of hydraulic lime for its ability to generate only pozzolanic and carbonation reactions. Furthermore, some authors report a better durability of hydrated lime mortars [38].…”
Section: Mineral Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical performance of masonry incorporating fired-clay bricks and mortars with relatively low elastic moduli have however been limited (e.g. limecement mortars [16] or lime-only mortars [18,[33][34][35], with most available studies focusing on masonry incorporating cement mortars [7,8,23,32]. The latter are not appropriate for the conservation of heritage masonry, as such repointing mortar produces problems such as brick spalling [36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%