2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-007-9143-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Three Mapping Methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With mapping in mind, previous studies have focused on scan registration with application to underground environments (Magnusson et al, 2007). Unfortunately, apart from a few examples, much of the academic literature about robotic mapping focuses on small-scale and indoor environments (Thrun, 2002;Zhang et al, 2007). Moreover, the use of robotic mapping is not widespread in the mining industry.…”
Section: Maps From Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With mapping in mind, previous studies have focused on scan registration with application to underground environments (Magnusson et al, 2007). Unfortunately, apart from a few examples, much of the academic literature about robotic mapping focuses on small-scale and indoor environments (Thrun, 2002;Zhang et al, 2007). Moreover, the use of robotic mapping is not widespread in the mining industry.…”
Section: Maps From Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perception and localization can be reached through subsequent actions, i.e. recognition and mapping (Thrun, 2003;Zhang et al, 2007), or through the Simultaneous Localization And Mapping techniques (SLAM) (e.g. Durrant-Whyte & Bailey, 2006).…”
Section: Autonomous Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To have a feasible algorithm to build this occupancy grid using a probabilistic approach it is necessary to assume that the current observation is independent from the previous ones, and that the probability of being occupied for each cell is independent from the others, but in most practical cases these assumptions fail, and the maps based on them contain severe errors, (see [41,62] for a comparison). A difference between the work presented here and probabilistic approaches is that our model does not need to assume that observations are independent, in fact, the opposite is assumed when some observations are used to correct others (see Section 4.2 for details).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%