2016
DOI: 10.4103/0970-5333.173457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of three different doses of nalbuphine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in abdominal hysterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same result reported by Tiwari et al [18] but by using smaller dose (0.2 and 0.4 mg) . Supporting the previous results, Ahmed et al [19] concluded that significant increase in postoperative duration of analgesia compared with the vehicle-treated group in abdominal operation following administration of intrathecal nalbuphine in doses of 0.8,1.6 and 2.4 mg .The same results were obtained by both Kumaresan and Raj [20] and Mukherjee et al [21] who used 0.4, 0.8 mg of intrathecally nalbuphine in patients scheduled in optional lower limb surgeries and show significant analgesia prolongation. On the other hand, Verma et al [22] concluded intrathecal nalbuphine 2 mg is effective in enhancing postoperative analgesia compared to bupivacaine alone or along with tramadol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The same result reported by Tiwari et al [18] but by using smaller dose (0.2 and 0.4 mg) . Supporting the previous results, Ahmed et al [19] concluded that significant increase in postoperative duration of analgesia compared with the vehicle-treated group in abdominal operation following administration of intrathecal nalbuphine in doses of 0.8,1.6 and 2.4 mg .The same results were obtained by both Kumaresan and Raj [20] and Mukherjee et al [21] who used 0.4, 0.8 mg of intrathecally nalbuphine in patients scheduled in optional lower limb surgeries and show significant analgesia prolongation. On the other hand, Verma et al [22] concluded intrathecal nalbuphine 2 mg is effective in enhancing postoperative analgesia compared to bupivacaine alone or along with tramadol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…There are numerous choices of neuraxial additives, such as opioids (morphine, fentanyl, buprenorphine, nalbuphine), N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonists (ketamine), alpha 2 adrenoceptor agonists (clonidine and dexmedetomidine), vasoconstrictors (adrenaline), Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) receptor agonists (midazolam), cholinergic agonists (neostigmine), and sodium bicarbonate, but no drug inhibits nociception without its associated side effects. [6] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it maintains the hemodynamic stability of the patient [ 4 ]. Fentanyl is an opioid receptor agonist that is synthetically prepared and is a type of phenyl piperidine derivative that is extremely potent due to its high lipophilicity [ 5 ]. Because of its rapid onset and narrowed time of action, with minimalistic cephalad spread, its use as an adjuvant to subarachnoid anesthesia is preferred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%