2020
DOI: 10.1177/1475921720903442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of two indirect methods to monitor surface integrity of ground components

Abstract: One of the major challenges in grinding is to conciliate the material removal rate with components free from damages. Due to the poor thermal conductivity of conventional grinding wheels, most of the heat generated during grinding is transferred to the workpiece surface and subsurface, which can cause thermal damages and impair the performance in service of machined components. Hence, it is very important to monitor the grinding process to ensure the quality of the machined parts. Thus, this work presents an i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 2, the white dots present in the microstructure of SAE 52100 steel represent the carbides that compose this material. The selection of the cutting parameters occurred taking into account the limitations of the machine tool, as well as other grinding research that was carried out on a machine tool similar to that used in the experimental tests of this current work, the primary references being the studies developed by Paiva et al [21], Guimarães et al [22], and Hübner et al [23]. Due to the constant rotation speed of the machine tool (2400 rpm), and considering the external diameter of the grinding wheel, the cutting speed was kept constant and equal to 37 m/s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 2, the white dots present in the microstructure of SAE 52100 steel represent the carbides that compose this material. The selection of the cutting parameters occurred taking into account the limitations of the machine tool, as well as other grinding research that was carried out on a machine tool similar to that used in the experimental tests of this current work, the primary references being the studies developed by Paiva et al [21], Guimarães et al [22], and Hübner et al [23]. Due to the constant rotation speed of the machine tool (2400 rpm), and considering the external diameter of the grinding wheel, the cutting speed was kept constant and equal to 37 m/s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rolling movement of billions of nanoparticles at the tool chip contact minimises friction and generates substantially superior surface quality 6 . Hübner et al, 7 conducted an experimental evaluation for delivery parameters and spray atomization of the MQL grinding process. They discovered that in MQL, the size of the liquid droplet was regulated by gas flow rate, lubricant flow rate, and lubricant physical parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, techniques based on the sensing of acoustic emission (AE) phenomena have gained increasing interest during the last few years due to their simplicity of use and the ability to monitor a wide variety of features, such as teeth breakage [ 7 , 8 ], runout [ 9 , 10 ] and chattering [ 11 , 12 ]. In particular, those techniques based on the use of noncontact sensors in the range of audible sound, such as different types of microphones [ 13 , 14 ], are particularly attractive due to the reduced intrusiveness, so they have been used for detecting the chattering phenomenon [ 15 , 16 , 17 ] and tool condition monitoring in conventional machining [ 18 , 19 ], high-speed machining [ 20 ] and abrasion processes [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%