2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of urban freight transport planning: addressing stakeholder needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
129
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
129
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Ballantyne et al (2013) provide a holistic view of different stakeholders but make a distinction between actors and stakeholders. An actor is a group that has a direct influence on city logistics, while stakeholders rather indirectly influence city logistics.…”
Section: Ucc Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ballantyne et al (2013) provide a holistic view of different stakeholders but make a distinction between actors and stakeholders. An actor is a group that has a direct influence on city logistics, while stakeholders rather indirectly influence city logistics.…”
Section: Ucc Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An actor is a group that has a direct influence on city logistics, while stakeholders rather indirectly influence city logistics. Since (in this thesis) a potential customer of UCCs can be anyone who can be positively affected by a UCC, there is no need to distinguish between actor and stakeholder (from Ballantyne et al, 2013). Instead, these two descriptions from Ballantyne et al (2013) are combined, which leads to the following definition: stakeholders are all those who have an interest in the system of city logistics (individuals, groups of people, organisations, companies, etc.)…”
Section: Ucc Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of the application do not show the expected effects even in the terms of ecology. In addition, prohibitive and restrictive measures limit the realization of logistics activities, instead of making them more efficient and sustainable (Allen et al, 2000;Ballantyne et al, 2013;Dablanc, 2007;Holguin-Veras et al, 2013;Quak, 2008;Quak and de Koster, 2009;Tadić et al, 2014b). On the other hand, the relaxation of restrictions for freight vehicles can cause economic and environmental benefits (McKinnon, 2005), reducing the total delivery and collection time, and the number of vehicles in the urban areas (Anderson et al, 2005).…”
Section: The Lack Of the City Logistics Plansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U najvećem broju slučajeva, kontakt između privatnog sektora i lokalne uprave uopšte ne postoji, a i kad postoji veoma je ograničen. [42] Lokalne vlasti uglavnom reaguju na primedbe i nezadovoljstvo ostalih učesnika CL. Primedbe mogu da dovedu do konsultacija lokalne uprave sa interesnim grupama, ali samo u cilju rešavanja konkretnog problema.…”
Section: Slika 2 -Interakcije Učesnika City Logistike [3]unclassified
“…Lokalnim vlastima je sve jasnije da u cilju rešavanja problema i definisanja održive politike CL moraju konsultovati privatni sektor, pre svega davaoce logističkih usluga. Primeri redovne saradnje, iako su retki, pokazuju da PPP značajno pomaže javnom sektoru da razume probleme i aktivnosti city logistike.Saradnja interesnih grupa, kao faktor uspeha inicijativa, rešenja CL, prisutna je u literaturi [15,18,22,42,43], ali se razlikuju mogućnosti, oblici i procene značaja njene primene. Osim toga, uspostavljanje partnerstva između učesnika nije uvek lako, a spremnost za poboljšanje city logistike zavisi od potreba interesnih grupa za promenama i njihovog poverenja u predložene inicijative Partnerstvo u funkciji održivog rešenja CL, ne znači uvek i bolje poslovne rezultate provajdera logističkih usluga.…”
unclassified