2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of using static and ultrasonic material testing methods to determine the anisotropic material properties of wood

Abstract: This paper presents a comparative study using static and ultrasonic testing for the determination of the full set of orthotropic material properties of wood. In the literature, material properties are typically only available in the longitudinal direction, and most international standards do not provide details on the testing of the other two secondary directions (radial and tangential). This work provides a comprehensive study and discussions on the determination of all twelve orthotropic material properties … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
35
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…And, it's occurred due to orthotropic nature of wood which is a natural composite. According to Dackermann et al [34] wave velocities decrease due to barrier function of annual rings. And, form and organizations of the hollow tubular cells of wood cause variation on both mechanical properties and anisotropy [50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And, it's occurred due to orthotropic nature of wood which is a natural composite. According to Dackermann et al [34] wave velocities decrease due to barrier function of annual rings. And, form and organizations of the hollow tubular cells of wood cause variation on both mechanical properties and anisotropy [50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in general ultrasonic measurements overestimates the results. And, according to Dackerman et al [34] there is around 20% overestimation of shear modulus when ultrasonic measurements performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The necessary parameters to characterize dynamically the test pieces with different compounds of wood are the apparent density (Niklas and Spatz, 2010) and the wave velocity in three directions of anisotropy of wood (Dackermann et al, 2016).By combining wave density and velocity the dynamic module is determined (Gonçalves et al, 2014). Another parameter in the mechanical design is the quality factor, which is similarly usedto classify and to compare the quality of wood (Spycher et al 2008).…”
Section: Ultrasound Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study examines orthotropic conditions for different species of wood and verifies the wood constants given in the reference material. When all elastic constants are given [7,10,11,12,15,16,21,22,23,29,31,33,39] it is sufficient see whether condition (2.9) is met ( Table 1, Table 2) because if eigenvalues are positive, the compliance matrix is positive-definite. For incomplete data [4,15,22] the conditions (2.7) are reviewed ( Table 3).…”
Section: Orthotropic Constants For Woodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, not all parameters of wood are always stated in the papers. For example, in [4,7,32] there are three elastic moduli and six Poisson's ratios but in [18] -only three elastic moduli and three shear moduli. In none of these cases it is possible to verify the model of wood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%