SAE Technical Paper Series 1996
DOI: 10.4271/960580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Variable Camshaft Phasing and Port Throttling for Performance and Emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exhaust gas recirculation from the exhaust side to the air intake side in certain operating conditions will further reduce emissions (Klotzbach, Sari, & Dismon, 2003). The angular position of the cam shaft and thus the opening and closing timing of the valves with respect to the cylinder position is another degree of freedom in engine control (Duckworth & Barker, 1996).…”
Section: Drive Train Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exhaust gas recirculation from the exhaust side to the air intake side in certain operating conditions will further reduce emissions (Klotzbach, Sari, & Dismon, 2003). The angular position of the cam shaft and thus the opening and closing timing of the valves with respect to the cylinder position is another degree of freedom in engine control (Duckworth & Barker, 1996).…”
Section: Drive Train Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential NOx improvements at part load are up to 80% [4] and the same report shows up to 50% improvement over the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). Full load performance is also improved through use of a VVT system [7]. These benefits are primarily examined against engines without the technology equipped and typically compared for steady state only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%