2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on Johnson Cook, modified Zerilli–Armstrong and Arrhenius-type constitutive models to predict elevated temperature flow behaviour in modified 9Cr–1Mo steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
174
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N. Hafizi et al The Johnson and Cook [22][23][24] material model is applied to the model. The Equation (1) and (2) as show the material flow stress as a function of strain, strain rate and temperature…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N. Hafizi et al The Johnson and Cook [22][23][24] material model is applied to the model. The Equation (1) and (2) as show the material flow stress as a function of strain, strain rate and temperature…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the constitutive model is affected not only by the deformation temperature and strain rate, but also by the strain in the hot deformation of metal materials [7,10,12,17,[29][30][31][32]. Therefore, the values of material coefficients (i.e.,  , A , n , Q ) of the constitutive equation are calculated under different strains in a range of 0.05 to 0.9 with the interval of 0.05 by the same method used previously.…”
Section: Arrhenius-type Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material constants for the steel plates were based on various material tests, and the data for bullets were mainly taken form the literature. Samantaray et al [24] performed a comparative study of Johnson-Cook, modified Zerilli-Armstrong and Arrhenius-type constitutive models. The experimental data from compressive tests were used to establish material constants for each of those formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%