2010 the 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccae.2010.5451991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on Measure of Semantic Relatedness function

Abstract: The semantic analysis and context awareness in data mining can intensively increase results precision. In this research different semantic relatedness functions called "Measure of Semantic Relatedness (MSR)" are discussed and compared. We found that the quality and accuracy of MSRs are different when applied in various contexts. Here we compared several MSR algorithms using different corpuses and have analyzed the results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MSR assumes that the strength of the relation between two terms is proportional to the number of times the two terms co-occurred in the same documents on the Web. The performance of the different MSR methods in terms of quality and accuracy was found to be dependent on the size and type of the input data (Emadzadeh et al 2010). Here, two of the more popular methods used to measure semantic relatedness in large data sets are employed, namely, Point-wise Mutual Information (PMI) and Normalised Search Similarity (NSS) (Matveeva 2008).…”
Section: Evaluating the Quality Of The Place Folkontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSR assumes that the strength of the relation between two terms is proportional to the number of times the two terms co-occurred in the same documents on the Web. The performance of the different MSR methods in terms of quality and accuracy was found to be dependent on the size and type of the input data (Emadzadeh et al 2010). Here, two of the more popular methods used to measure semantic relatedness in large data sets are employed, namely, Point-wise Mutual Information (PMI) and Normalised Search Similarity (NSS) (Matveeva 2008).…”
Section: Evaluating the Quality Of The Place Folkontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the different MSR methods in terms of quality and accuracy is found to be dependent on the size and type of the input data [23]. More details and comparisons about the different MSR methods can be found in [11]. In this experiment, the Point-wise Mutual Information (PMI) [39] and the Normalised Search Similarity (NSS) [25] methods are chosen to evaluate the quality of the derived tag relationships.…”
Section: Quantitative Ontology Evaluation Using Semantic Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%