2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on modified Zerilli–Armstrong, Arrhenius-type and artificial neural network models to predict high-temperature deformation behavior in T24 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the research, the performance of the ANN model was evaluated by using a wide variety of standard statistical indices, which turned out that the extrapolation ability of neural network model was very high in the proximity of training domain. Li et al [16] conducted a comprehensive and comparative study on Zerilli-Armstrong, Arrhenius-type and ANN models in terms of their prediction ability of hot deformation behavior of T24 steel. Quan et al [17] applied ANN to predict the flow stress of as-cast Ti-6Al-2Zr-1Mo-1V alloy, which suggested that the ANN model has a good capacity to model complicated flow behavior of titanium alloy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the research, the performance of the ANN model was evaluated by using a wide variety of standard statistical indices, which turned out that the extrapolation ability of neural network model was very high in the proximity of training domain. Li et al [16] conducted a comprehensive and comparative study on Zerilli-Armstrong, Arrhenius-type and ANN models in terms of their prediction ability of hot deformation behavior of T24 steel. Quan et al [17] applied ANN to predict the flow stress of as-cast Ti-6Al-2Zr-1Mo-1V alloy, which suggested that the ANN model has a good capacity to model complicated flow behavior of titanium alloy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the R-values for the predicted true stress of BP-ANN and modified Arrhenius are 0.9998 and 0.9899, respectively, from another quantitative perspective proving the strong linear relationships between the predicted and experimental true stress. Additionally, the AARE-values relative to the experimental true stress was calculated by Equation (19) and exhibited in Figure 9. According to the calculation results, it is manifest that the AARE-value for the BP-ANN model is 1.20%, but, for the constitutive equation, it reaches a higher level, 3.06%.…”
Section: Prediction Capability Comparison Between the Bp-ann Model Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output flow stress was varies from 3.86 Mpa to 237.53 Mpa. Therefore, the input and output data were measured in different units, before training, all the data need to be normalized into the dimensionless units to remove the arbitrary effect of similarity between the different data 28,29 . The temperature, strain and flow stress were normalized within the range from 0 to 0.25 using the relation given by Equation 1, the strain rate was normalized within the range from 0.05 to 0.3 using the relation given by Equation 2.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%