2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3975948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study on Removal of Hazardous Anions from Water by Adsorption: A Review

Abstract: This paper presents a comparative review of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F − ) for a better understanding of the conditions and factors during their adsorption with focus on (i) the isotherm adsorption models, (ii) effects of pH, (iii) effects of ionic strength, and (iv) effects of coexisting substances such as anions, cations, and natural organics matter. It provides an indepth analysis of various methods of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F − ) removal by adsorption… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 178 publications
(342 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, decrease in the % of As(III) removal in the presence of high concentration of CO 3 2− ion could be attributed to the inhibitory adsorption effect of As(III) compared to CO 3 2− on the surface of PNHM/Fe 3 O 4 -40. Alternatively, the possibility of formation of arsenic-carbonate As(CO 3 ) 2− , As(CO 3 )(OH) 2− , and AsCO 3 + complex in the presence of high concentration of CO 3 2− could also account for the observed decrease in arsenic adsorption 63 . In contrast, unaltered selectivity of arsenic in the presence of SO 4 2− (pK b = 7.04) could result in preferential adsorption of AsO 4 3− (pK b = 2.5) on the surface of PNHM/Fe 3 O 4 -40 through hydrogen bonding 64 .…”
Section: Effect Of Co-existing Ions the Various Interfering Anions Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, decrease in the % of As(III) removal in the presence of high concentration of CO 3 2− ion could be attributed to the inhibitory adsorption effect of As(III) compared to CO 3 2− on the surface of PNHM/Fe 3 O 4 -40. Alternatively, the possibility of formation of arsenic-carbonate As(CO 3 ) 2− , As(CO 3 )(OH) 2− , and AsCO 3 + complex in the presence of high concentration of CO 3 2− could also account for the observed decrease in arsenic adsorption 63 . In contrast, unaltered selectivity of arsenic in the presence of SO 4 2− (pK b = 7.04) could result in preferential adsorption of AsO 4 3− (pK b = 2.5) on the surface of PNHM/Fe 3 O 4 -40 through hydrogen bonding 64 .…”
Section: Effect Of Co-existing Ions the Various Interfering Anions Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface area, pore size and morphology analysis: Granular activated carbon (GAC) was subjected to pore size distribution and surface area analysis. BET-surface area of GAC was found to be 998 m 2 /g, the particle density 0.7950 g/ cm 3 , pore volume 0.825 cm 3 /g and the pore diameter less than 20 AU was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The phenomenon of adsorption is most widely employed for separation, treatment of waste effluent, refrigeration, environmental pollution control, etc. [1][2][3]. Organic compounds such as aniline, benzoic acid, aldehydes, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various arsenic absorbents, iron oxide is one of the most promising adsorbents because it exhibits selective affinity for arsenic ions and is a very cheap material that is abundant in nature. Therefore, iron oxide may be a very effective alternative for domestic water treatment when used as an adsorbent in a filtration system [12,13]. Much research has been done on iron-oxide-modified media, including iron-oxide-coated zeolite [14], cement [15], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [16], activated carbon [17], biomasses [18], activated alumina [19], and polymers, for arsenic removal [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%