2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study on the Performance of GSCA and CSA in Parameter Recovery for Structural Equation Models With Ordinal Observed Variables

Abstract: A simulation based comparative study was designed to compare two alternative approaches to structural equation modeling—generalized structured component analysis (GSCA) with the alternating least squares (ALS) estimator vs. covariance structure analysis (CSA) with the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator or the weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimator—in terms of parameter recovery with ordinal observed variables. The simulated conditions included the number of response categories in ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A web-based software for generalized structure component analysis [41] was used for hypothesis testing as well as complementary analyses (e.g., internal consistencies, correlations). The generalized structured component analysis (GSCA) [42] is an approach to component-based structure equation modeling (SEM) and works well with a small sample size, without rigid distributional assumptions (e.g., normality assumption) [43].…”
Section: Intention To Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A web-based software for generalized structure component analysis [41] was used for hypothesis testing as well as complementary analyses (e.g., internal consistencies, correlations). The generalized structured component analysis (GSCA) [42] is an approach to component-based structure equation modeling (SEM) and works well with a small sample size, without rigid distributional assumptions (e.g., normality assumption) [43].…”
Section: Intention To Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of the participants was Asian (59.09%), 27.27% were Caucasian, 12.82% were American Indian/Alaska Native, 4.55% were Hispanic, and 1.52% were African American/Black. Generalized structured component analysis (GSCA) [39,40] was used for evaluating our proposed research model due to its flexibility to work with a small sample size without requiring rigid normal distribution [41,42]. GSCA is a component-based approach to structural equation modeling, which enables to evaluate the measurement model for the associations between the TAM constructs and their indicators/items (i.e., loadings, reliability), as well as the structural model for the directional relationship among the TAM constructs (i.e., research hypotheses).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalized structured component analysis (GSCA) [56][57][58] was conducted to evaluate the proposed research model. GSCA is an approach to component-based structural equation modeling and works well with a small sample size without requiring rigid distributional assumptions such as multivariate normality [59][60][61]. Web-based software for GSCA was used for the analysis, available online at [62].…”
Section: Perceived Visual Designmentioning
confidence: 99%