2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4919924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on the modeling of dynamic after-cavity interaction in gyrotrons

Abstract: Experimental observation of the effect of aftercavity interaction in a depressed collector gyrotron oscillatorThere are cases where gyrotron interaction simulations predict dynamic After-Cavity Interaction (ACI). In dynamic ACI, a mode is excited by the electron beam at a dominant frequency in the gyrotron cavity and, at the same time, this mode is also interacting with the beam at a different frequency in the non-linear uptaper after the cavity. In favor of dynamic ACI being a real physical effect, there are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that a typical time of variations in the field axial structure (about 5-10 ns) is much greater than the electron transit time through the resonator (about 0.1 ns). Therefore, the assumption about the smallness of the electron transit time in comparison with the cavity fill time used in MAGY as well as in many other codes is valid in our case and, correspondingly, there is no reason to take into account field modifications during the electron transit time, which were considered in [37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Note that a typical time of variations in the field axial structure (about 5-10 ns) is much greater than the electron transit time through the resonator (about 0.1 ns). Therefore, the assumption about the smallness of the electron transit time in comparison with the cavity fill time used in MAGY as well as in many other codes is valid in our case and, correspondingly, there is no reason to take into account field modifications during the electron transit time, which were considered in [37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On this gyrotron, nanosecond-pulses were observed, [22][23][24] which result in a very strong and fast variation of the field-profile. Another situation, in which the model of TWANG is no longer valid is in the case of dynamic After-Cavity-Interaction (ACI), [25][26][27] for which there are weak and unclear experimental evidences. 28 In order to be able to simulate these situations realistically, one has to relax the above-mentioned approximation.…”
Section: Code Description and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic ACI has been predicted by different codes based on similar models as the one implemented in TWANG. [25][26][27] In these cases, a parasitic interaction, often with the same transverse mode, is predicted by trajectory-like codes as TWANG in the far uptaper-region or launcher region behind the cavity. The ACI-frequency is of the order of 5%-10% below the main frequency, close to the cutoff-frequency in the uptaper region, where the ACIoscillation is excited.…”
Section: -5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3]). The Fourier transform of (4) yields (8) The term comes from the normalization of the Fourier transform used in this paper; more details can be found in the Appendix. The spatial derivative of (8) is (9) Assuming that uniform waveguides are attached at the ends of the gyrotron cavity (i.e., at the ends of the simulated interaction region), we can substitute (9) and (8) into (2).…”
Section: A General Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) It has been already observed from numerical simulations, that nonstationary dynamic after-cavity-interaction (ACI) may cause the appearance of other frequencies [7], [8]. Furthermore, there are frequencies measured from the experiment using the system in [9], which are suspected to be the spectral lines caused by ACIs [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%