A comparative study on the removal of an emerging contaminant Mefenamic acid from aqueous media by various advanced oxidation methods

Deepa, R.; Madhu, G.; Thomas, Roy M.

doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.013

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The treatment approaches of MA from wastewater are not limited to electro-Fenton degradation (Dolatabadi et al 2020), activated charcoal, and a micelle-clay complex (Khalaf et al 2013), chlorine dioxide (Hey et al 2012), biological treatment (Hata et al 2010;Rosal et al 2010;Deepa et al 2021), membranes (Kimura et al 2005;Radjenovićet al 2009) and oxidation (Colombo et al 2016;Deepa et al 2021). Additionally, the electrochemical method is attracting the attention of researchers because of its cheapness (Hashim et al 2021b;Arab et al 2022) and environmental safety (Abdulhadi et al 2021;Hashim et al 2021a); therefore, it can be a suggestion in this paper for removing MA from wastewater.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of mefenamic acid in aqueous solutions using merging zone – continuous flow injection

Al-Ameer

Hashim²,

Taha

2022

Water Practice and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims at using a novel algorithm to determine the concentration of Mefenamic acid (MA) in solutions using Merging Zone-Continuous Flow Injection. The MA concentration in aqueous solutions was determined using this technology, and the results obtained using this method were compared to those obtained using more conventional methods. All flow injection analyses were carried out utilizing a Rheodyne valve 7725, a Rabbit peristaltic pump, a BioLogic QuadTec UV-Vis Detector, and a Sartorius CPA2P Competence Analytical Balance, as well as a Sartorius CPA2P Competence Analytical Balance. The data is then received by a signal detector and a specialized software spectrometer. A spectroscopic scan is used to determine the maximum wavelength of the product, a calibration curve is created, and measurements are taken to estimate the drug's absolute concentrations in aqueous solutions. The detection and quantitative limits were set to 0.021 and 0.071 parts per million. This treatment is popular because it is simple, rapid, precise, inexpensive, and adaptable. This method could be a good alternative to the conventional methods because it is simple, rapid, precise, inexpensive, and adaptable.

show abstract