2017
DOI: 10.7232/iems.2017.16.4.604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study on the Detectability between Haptic and Auditory Signals under Driving and Non-driving Task Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To confirm the first hypothesis, an emotional evaluation was performed on the haptic signal through KW. In the haptic signal design, the two parameters (frequency, acceleration) were independent of each other, and the detection range was confirmed through prior research [ 11 ]. In addition, because a previous study conducted work in which the driver discriminated between four signals at once [ 12 ], the experiment was configured so that four different signals were presented in one block.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To confirm the first hypothesis, an emotional evaluation was performed on the haptic signal through KW. In the haptic signal design, the two parameters (frequency, acceleration) were independent of each other, and the detection range was confirmed through prior research [ 11 ]. In addition, because a previous study conducted work in which the driver discriminated between four signals at once [ 12 ], the experiment was configured so that four different signals were presented in one block.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Acceleration can be adjusted by changing the voltage applied to the actuator, and frequency can be determined by adjusting the interval between signals as a parameter for how many signals are generated per second. The range of two independent parameters was designed to discriminate haptic signals within the frequency range of 80–250 Hz and the acceleration range of 2–5 G, according to previous studies [ 11 , 12 ]. For the haptic signal, the actuator Mark-II was selected by considering signal change range and a precision suitable for the research purposes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation