2020
DOI: 10.5958/2349-2996.2020.00075.0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study to Assess the Level of Internet Addiction Among B.Sc. Nursing and GNM Students at Rama College of Nursing Kanpur with a view to Develop Information Booklet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Turkish study of 1558 high school students reported a PIU prevalence estimate of 21.1% [24] . However, one Indian study [25] reported a prevalence estimate of 47.0% among 470 nursing students. All of the aforementioned recent studies used the same instrument (IAT) and cut score (i.e., ≥50) but still produced inconsistent results which might be attributed – at least partially – to methodological and cultural differences as well as the non-representativeness of the different types of cohorts sampled.…”
Section: The Inconsistency Of Piu Prevalence Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Turkish study of 1558 high school students reported a PIU prevalence estimate of 21.1% [24] . However, one Indian study [25] reported a prevalence estimate of 47.0% among 470 nursing students. All of the aforementioned recent studies used the same instrument (IAT) and cut score (i.e., ≥50) but still produced inconsistent results which might be attributed – at least partially – to methodological and cultural differences as well as the non-representativeness of the different types of cohorts sampled.…”
Section: The Inconsistency Of Piu Prevalence Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get network parameters, we use an unsupervised greedy algorithm to pre-train the network model. First, the first layer RBM1 is trained, a vector is generated in the visual layer of RBM1, and the generated value is transmitted to the hidden layer; Then, Thirusangu et al reconstructed the input signal of the visual layer 14 , and the data of the visual layer is randomly extracted and transmitted to the hidden layer. It trains each layer by using the maximum function learning method and combining deep learning network and training mechanism.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Research Status Of Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%