2019
DOI: 10.1080/22041451.2019.1677068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative tale of two methods: how thematic and narrative analyses author the data story differently

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The questions (for the semi-structured investigative) interview, which we prepared as a default-option, turned out to be superfluous because after the general introduction the interviewees proceeded immediately to what we called “self-thematization”, meaning the independent choice of their substantive focus und thematic prioritization. We conclude that thematic and narrative methods, when integrated, produce a multidimensional understanding of the perception and reality of “integration” (compare McAllum et al 2019 ; Kohler Riessman 2008 ).…”
Section: Migrant Integration In Luxembourg: An Examination Of Small-state Theory In Practicementioning
confidence: 82%
“…The questions (for the semi-structured investigative) interview, which we prepared as a default-option, turned out to be superfluous because after the general introduction the interviewees proceeded immediately to what we called “self-thematization”, meaning the independent choice of their substantive focus und thematic prioritization. We conclude that thematic and narrative methods, when integrated, produce a multidimensional understanding of the perception and reality of “integration” (compare McAllum et al 2019 ; Kohler Riessman 2008 ).…”
Section: Migrant Integration In Luxembourg: An Examination Of Small-state Theory In Practicementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Data were analyzed with Atlas.ti software using narrative analysis (McAllum et al, 2019). We used an inductive approach, focusing on the content of participants' stories, how the narrative was constructed, how the participant positioned themselves and the roles they assume, the motives of actors involved in the story, the temporal and sequential linking of events, the factors identified as contributing to or precipitating their NFSB, the language and metaphors employed, and the plots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also apparent in the different forms of narrative analysis, with some focusing on the teller or the communication, and some focusing on the story (Riessman, 2008). The common ground between these traditions is that they all aim to capture how one event leads to another (McAllum et al, 2019).…”
Section: Using Narrative Methods In the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%