2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-6707-0_58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Analysis of Mobile Forensic Investigation Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study [12] concentrated on android forensics and proposed a framework of seven stages namely: Intake, Identification, Preparation, Isolation, Processing, Verification, and Documentation. A comparative analysis of five common process models was provided by [13], these models are the Smartphone Forensic Investigation Process Model (SFIPM), Windows Mobile Device Forensic Model (WMDFM), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Harmonized Digital Forensic Investigation (HDFI), and USFIPM. The authors also proposed a secure model by deploying blockchain using Ethereum or a hyperledger platform.…”
Section: ) Mobile Forensics Models and Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study [12] concentrated on android forensics and proposed a framework of seven stages namely: Intake, Identification, Preparation, Isolation, Processing, Verification, and Documentation. A comparative analysis of five common process models was provided by [13], these models are the Smartphone Forensic Investigation Process Model (SFIPM), Windows Mobile Device Forensic Model (WMDFM), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Harmonized Digital Forensic Investigation (HDFI), and USFIPM. The authors also proposed a secure model by deploying blockchain using Ethereum or a hyperledger platform.…”
Section: ) Mobile Forensics Models and Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparative analysis between our approach and existing frameworks, we have utilized the comparison done by [13] who compared five forensic frameworks, they are SFIPM, WMDFM, NIST, HDFI, and USFIPM and NIST. Table 1 shows an updated version of this comparison including our approach as proof of its usability.…”
Section: ) Common Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of [9] concentrated on android forensics and proposed a framework of seven stages namely: Intake, Identi cation, Preparation, Isolation, Processing, Veri cation, and Documentation. A comparative analysis of ve common process models was provided in [10], these models are SFIPM, WMDFM, NIST, HDFI, and USFIPM & NIST. The authors also proposed a secure model by deploying blockchain using Ethereum or a hyper ledger platform…”
Section: Mobile Forensics Models and Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%