2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0385-8146(99)00049-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison and conversion table of ‘the House–Brackmann facial nerve grading system’ and ‘the Yanagihara grading system’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature we find subjective methods, which the examiner, based on a scale, assigns paralysis grading as House-Brakmann 28 , Yanagihara 7 or, even, the system called Toronto Facial Grading System, We used the data without differentiating the right and left sides, in order to calculate the movements at rest and after the contraction, considering what can be seen on general tables (attachment), and also according to what some authors have already recorded; these numbers show a statistically irrelevant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature we find subjective methods, which the examiner, based on a scale, assigns paralysis grading as House-Brakmann 28 , Yanagihara 7 or, even, the system called Toronto Facial Grading System, We used the data without differentiating the right and left sides, in order to calculate the movements at rest and after the contraction, considering what can be seen on general tables (attachment), and also according to what some authors have already recorded; these numbers show a statistically irrelevant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1985, The Facial Nerve Disorders Committee of the American Academy of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery adopted, as universal standard, a grading system based on the studies carried out by House and Brackmann, which is used all over the world today and by all researchers in the field 6 . Many other scales have been suggested, for instance, the one from Yanagihara, used in Japan, which assesses 10 facial areas; but it does not consider secondary changes, such as synkinesia 7 . Burres & Fish 8 introduced an objective method to measure distances between specific facial points during rest and five standard movements comparing the affected side on the face with the normal one (Burres and Fish's Linear Measure Index), using photographs and video.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate facial function, we used Yanagihara's Unweighted Grading System (Y-system) and the HouseBrackmann Grading System (HB-system). The Y-system assesses the level of paralysis in the different situations, whereas the HB-system focuses on facial movement as a whole 12) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, identification, evaluation, and follow-up of this surgical complication are very important. Among the clinical methods employed for evaluation of frequency and degree of nerve injury, the HouseBrackmann grading system appears to be quick, comprehensive, and widely used [6]. Aims and Objective: To assess the efficacy of mouth opening exercises in patients with reduced mouth opening & electrical stimulation for facial muscle weakness along with facial exercises in improving the motor function of facial nerve after TMJ surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%