2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between a TESQ accelerator and a reactor as a neutron sources for BNCT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a facility, in combination with an optimized beam shaping assembly has been shown to be able to deliver treatments of comparable quality of the best present-day reactors. [27][28][29] As an intermediate step, a smaller machine, a folded TESQ with a terminal at 700 kV is also being developed to be used with the Be(d,n) reaction. 8 …”
Section: Electrostatic Acceleratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a facility, in combination with an optimized beam shaping assembly has been shown to be able to deliver treatments of comparable quality of the best present-day reactors. [27][28][29] As an intermediate step, a smaller machine, a folded TESQ with a terminal at 700 kV is also being developed to be used with the Be(d,n) reaction. 8 …”
Section: Electrostatic Acceleratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of using these sources are: simple application, high safety in hospital environments, relative low cost compared with reactors, easy turning off, providing sufficient neutron flux, and less overall risk than nuclear reactors. However, the most crucial aspects for accelerator-based neutron sources are the type and energies of incident particles, and target material selection [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%