2019
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.44528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Between Bevacizumab and Mitomycin C in Treatment of Primary Pterygium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, there no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding pre-operative examination. This was in line with the study by Nassar et al, [6] who reported that the two studied groups were statistically comparable as regard main complain and the Side of pterygium in addition to the pre-treatment eye examinations. Also, in agreement with our results the study by Hwang and Choi, [7] reported that there was no statistically significant difference between the studied groups regarding laterality, preoperative pterygium grade, or horizontal distance from the corneal limbus to the pterygium head among the groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, there no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding pre-operative examination. This was in line with the study by Nassar et al, [6] who reported that the two studied groups were statistically comparable as regard main complain and the Side of pterygium in addition to the pre-treatment eye examinations. Also, in agreement with our results the study by Hwang and Choi, [7] reported that there was no statistically significant difference between the studied groups regarding laterality, preoperative pterygium grade, or horizontal distance from the corneal limbus to the pterygium head among the groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Regarding recurrence among the studied groups, our results showed that after one month was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (p>0.001) while there were not significantly differences between the two groups regarding recurrence after 1 week, after 3 months and after 6 months (p>0.05). Disagree to us, the study by Nassar et al, [6], reported that the pterygium recurred in 7 cases (35%) out of 20 cases. The recurrence in bevacizumab group occurred in 6 cases (60%) out of 10 cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the recurrence rates vary between the different groups in some studies. For example, in a study conducted by Nassar et al [24], a signi cant recurrence rate was observed in the bevacizumab group (60%) compared to the MMC group (10%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Statistical analysis: The sample size was calculated based on the ndings of the study by Nassar et al [24] based on the outcome of pterygium recurrence in patients. Due to the existence of 3 groups, 13 patients were multiplied by 1.4, resulting in a sample size of 19 people in each group; however, the nal sample size was determined to be 63 patients (21 individuals in each group) considering a dropout rate of 10%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%