A comparison between Cadastre 2014 and cadastral systems of different countries

Manzoor, S.; Qureshi, Taimur A.; Liaqat, Muhammad D.; Farooq, Muhammad Kashif; Shamail, Shafay

doi:10.1145/1693042.1693102

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…http://dx.doi.org/10.15659/uzalcbs2018.6731 Kadastro 2014 vizyonu dünya genelinde mevcut ve geleneksel kadastral sistemlerin sosyal, hukuksal, ekonomik ve teknik yönden ortak yönlerini ortaya koyarak (Manzoor et al, 2009) geleceğin kadastrosuna yön veren önemli bir vizyon çalışmasıdır (Cete 2015). Raporda mevcut kadastral sitemlerin güçlü yönleri; mülkiyet hakkının yasal güvenceye sahip olması, kullanıcıların veriye internet üzerinden erişebilmeleri ve kadastronun tüm ülke yüzeyini kapsaması olarak ifade edilmektedir.…”

Section: Kadastro 2014 Vi̇zyonuunclassified

Kadastro 2034 Vi̇zyonu Açisindan Türki̇ye Kadastrosunun Mevcut Durum Anali̇zi̇

Polat¹

2018

Vii. Uzaktan Algilama Ve CBS Sempozyumu Uzal-Cbs2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye'deki mevcut arazi idaresi ve kadastro sisteminin durum tespitini yaparak mevcut yapının Kadastro 2034 vizyonu prensipleriyle entegrasyonunun sağlanması için en uygun stratejiyi belirlemeye yardımcı olmaktır. Çalışmada Türkiye'deki mevcut arazi idaresi ve kadastro sisteminin hukuksal, kurumsal ve teknik durumu SWOT analiz yöntemi kullanılarak tespit edilmiştir. Bu kapsamda öncelikle Türkiye'deki mevcut arazi idaresi ve kadastro sisteminin hukuksal, kurumsal ve teknik açıdan üstün veya zayıf yönleri ile dış çevreden kaynaklanan fırsat ve tehditler SWOT matrisi ile belirlenmiştir. Analiz neticesinde tehditleri ortadan kaldıracak ve zayıf yönleri güçlendirecek önerilerde bulunmuştur.

show abstract

Section: Kadastro 2014 Vi̇zyonuunclassified

Kadastro 2034 Vi̇zyonu Açisindan Türki̇ye Kadastrosunun Mevcut Durum Anali̇zi̇

Polat¹

2018

Vii. Uzaktan Algilama Ve CBS Sempozyumu Uzal-Cbs2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cadastre 2014 and land administration concepts have widely impacted on the development of cadastral systems in many jurisdictions and significant progress has been made in modernising cadastres, including in NZ (Bevin, 1999, Hirst, 2010, Kaufmann et al, 2002, Manzoor et al, 2009, van der Molen, 2003. But the concept of the land object that was introduced by Cadastre 2014, has facilitated a conceptual shift in cadastral thinking from that focused on parcels to one that is objects oriented (Figure 4).…”

Section: Understanding and Defining A Cadastrementioning

confidence: 99%

Crowdsourcing the Cadastre: The Applicability of Crowdsourced Geospatial Information to the New Zealand Cadastre

Clouston¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>Crowdsourcing has transformed how geographic information is collected, stored, disseminated, analysed, visualised and used (Sui et al., 2013b). Yet, crowdsourcing has had little impact on core government geospatial data. This ‘authoritative data’ is often tightly controlled with a focus on data quality and security for protection from unauthorised change (Rice et al., 2012). Opportunities for consumers, users and existing data producers to contribute their skills and information to enhance authoritative government geospatial data has been limited. The adoption, or use, of crowdsourcing by Government has been slow (Haklay et al., 2014). The New Zealand Cadastre, managed by Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) is an example of a core government geospatial system that has collated and managed data for over a century. Despite data meeting the contemporary acceptance standards when it was integrated into the cadastre, data quality is often questioned by users as inaccuracies or discrepancies are identified (Opus, 2013). Web 2.0 technologies and easy to use mobile devices enabled geospatial capability and a user skill base to an increased acceptance of crowdsourcing as a means to build and maintain geospatial datasets (Kostanski, 2012, McLaren, 2011, Rice et al., 2012). Accordingly, if cadastral data is to be maintained and enhanced to meet modern expectations for multiple use (LINZ, 2013a, Cadastre Ltd, 2003), one option is the use of crowdsourcing (Grant et al., 2014, LINZ, 2013a). This thesis examines the potential applicability of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) as a specific form of crowdsourcing within an authoritative database - the New Zealand Cadastre. Using a two phase quantitative and qualitative methodology, the perspectives of users, data providers and administrators are explored to ascertain the applicability of VGI to the New Zealand Cadastre. This thesis finds that crowdsourcing concepts could enable users to contribute data or information, re-conceptualise the role of the existing data providers (predominately licensed cadastral surveyors) and enable the reuse of cadastral related work. Cadastral VGI can provide advances in data collection and maintenance processes; if users, data producers and administrators change their perception of what crowdsourcing is, and what it can provide. However, the importance of user perception in the quality of the dataset will need to be strongly considered in any integration of VGI into the cadastre or other authoritative datasets.</p>

show abstract