2017
DOI: 10.2528/pierc17080501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Between Carson's Formulae and a 2d Fem Approach for the Evaluation of Ac Interference Caused by Overhead Power Lines on Buried Metallic Pipelines

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, the AC interference produced by an overhead power transmission line on a buried metallic pipeline is estimated using a circuital method based on the well-known Carson's formulae and a two-dimensional finite element numerical code. The finite element formulation used in this paper implicitly takes into account the mutual inductive coupling between all the considered conductors, and it allows a more detailed analysis in cases where a nonhomogeneous soil is present. The FEM approach includ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetic field strength in the external area of pipe is significantly stronger than that in the internal area. [32][33][34] Under ideal conditions, assuming the pipe is with infinite length and the magnetic shielding coefficient is recorded as the ratio of external magnetic field of pipe to internal magnetic field of pipe, which can be calculated by using Equation (6). When the magnetic induction line is parallel to the iron pipe, the magnetic induction line in the air will not bend toward the ferromagnetic material, so the axial magnetic shielding coefficient can be taken as 1.…”
Section: Magnetic Shielding Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic field strength in the external area of pipe is significantly stronger than that in the internal area. [32][33][34] Under ideal conditions, assuming the pipe is with infinite length and the magnetic shielding coefficient is recorded as the ratio of external magnetic field of pipe to internal magnetic field of pipe, which can be calculated by using Equation (6). When the magnetic induction line is parallel to the iron pipe, the magnetic induction line in the air will not bend toward the ferromagnetic material, so the axial magnetic shielding coefficient can be taken as 1.…”
Section: Magnetic Shielding Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, researchers have studied this topic for several decades, and many modeling efforts have been made throughout the years. Much of the initial efforts in this field originated from circuital or transmission line approaches based on Carson's formulae for mutual impedance [13][14][15][16]. These methods are also generally based on performing a discretization of the considered corridor into sets of coupled smaller sections, described by lumped parameters [17]; such circuital approaches are computationally efficient, making them suitable for fast evaluations or parametric studies.…”
Section: Introduction Concerns Over Metallic Pipelines Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms are mainly based on the transmission line model for both inducing and induced plants. Afterwards, other algorithms based on Finite Element Method (FEM) have been proposed [10][11][12][13], and more recently, some theoretical evaluations of the AC induced corrosion risk have been presented in [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%