A comparison between manual and artificial intelligence–based automatic positioning in CT imaging for COVID-19 patients

Abstract

Objective To analyze and compare the imaging workflow, radiation dose, and image quality for COVID-19 patients examined using either the conventional manual positioning (MP) method or an AI-based automatic positioning (AP) method. Materials and methods One hundred twenty-seven adult COVID-19 patients underwent chest CT scans on a CT scanner using the same scan protocol except with the manual positioning (MP group) for the initial scan and an AI-based automatic positioning method (AP group) for the follow-up scan. Radiation dose, patient positioning time, and off-center distance of the two groups were recorded and compared. Image noise and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were assessed by three experienced radiologists and were compared between the two groups. Results The AP operation was successful for all patients in the AP group and reduced the total positioning time by 28% compared with the MP group. Compared with the MP group, the AP group had significantly less patient off-center distance (AP 1.56 cm ± 0.83 vs. MP 4.05 cm ± 2.40, p < 0.001) and higher proportion of positioning accuracy (AP 99% vs. MP 92%), resulting in 16% radiation dose reduction (AP 6.1 mSv ± 1.3 vs. MP 7.3 mSv ± 1.2, p < 0.001) and 9% image noise reduction in erector spinae and lower noise and higher SNR for lesions in the pulmonary peripheral areas. Conclusion The AI-based automatic positioning and centering in CT imaging is a promising new technique for reducing radiation dose and optimizing imaging workflow and image quality in imaging the chest. Key Points • The AI-based automatic positioning (AP) operation was successful for all patients in our study. • AP method reduced the total positioning time by 28% compared with the manual positioning (MP). • AP method had less patient off-center distance and higher proportion of positioning accuracy than MP method, resulting in 16% radiation dose reduction and 9% image noise reduction in erector spinae.

Influence of tube and patient positioning in thoracoabdominal CT examinations on radiation exposure–towards a better patient positioning

“…The distance of the patient centre to the gantry iso-centre is often measured on a single slice rather than on several slices or the whole stack [5,14]. For symmetric phantoms, this distance is usually identical throughout the image stack; however, for patients or anthropomorphic phantoms, the distance to the iso-centre varies along the z-axis.…”

Value Creation Through Artificial Intelligence and Cardiovascular Imaging: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

“…16 For CT, AI could assist imagers with dose optimization by automating patient positioning using the specific acquisition protocol. 17 In MRI, AI tools can detect and mitigate motion artifacts to improve image quality 18 ; accelerate acquisitions, leading to overall shorter examination times 19 ; and automate contouring for evaluation of ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. 20…”

Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Radiology: Where Are We Going?

“…In both studies, significant improvement in patient centering was achieved, compared to manual positioning, with less extreme standard deviations from the ideal isocenter of the patients. More recently, a study by Gang et al, utilizing automated positioning, demonstrated a decrease of 16% in the dosage supplied to the patient, with a saving of 28% of the time [ 18 ].…”