2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between neutron-fluence measurements using metal-activation monitors and standard glasses calibrated via thin uranium-fission monitors and via ηq method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies (Bellemans, 1996;Bigazzi et al, 1990;Curvo et al, 2013;De Corte et al, 1991, 1995Jonckheere, 1995;Van den haute et al, 1988Van den haute et al, , 1998 give reason for trusting that the calculated neutron fluences are accurate. The agreement of the uranium concentrations calculated with Eq.…”
Section: Apparent Fission-track Agementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier studies (Bellemans, 1996;Bigazzi et al, 1990;Curvo et al, 2013;De Corte et al, 1991, 1995Jonckheere, 1995;Van den haute et al, 1988Van den haute et al, , 1998 give reason for trusting that the calculated neutron fluences are accurate. The agreement of the uranium concentrations calculated with Eq.…”
Section: Apparent Fission-track Agementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our contribution sets out from the premise that neutron-fluence measurements using the recommended metal monitors (Au, Co) and wellthermalized irradiation facilities are no longer an issue (Bigazzi et al, 1990;Curvo et al, 2013;De Corte et al, 1991, 1995Van den haute et al, 1988Van den haute et al, , 1998. Our second assumption is that the matter of the fission constant has been settled following recent redeterminations (Eikenberg et al, 1993;Guedes et al, 2000Guedes et al, , 2003Suzuki, 2005;Yoshioka et al, 2005) and reassessments (Holden, 1989;Holden and Hoffman, 2000).…”
Section: Introduction: Premisesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The observed differences could come from the thin film calibration, from the glass calibration procedure or from efficiency calibrations necessary for dating. Curvo et al [26] advanced in the solution of this problem firstly recalibrating the thin films using a more reliable a-spectrometry calibration instead of alpha activity detected in polyallyldiglycol carbonate (PADC) alpha-track detectors calibrated via nuclear emulsion [20,22,23] because this procedure makes U-thin films calibration very ingenious and etching/observation efficiencies have to be taken into account. With electronic alpha particle spectrometry, this laborious procedure can be avoided and U-thin films can be calibrated directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With electronic alpha particle spectrometry, this laborious procedure can be avoided and U-thin films can be calibrated directly. In a second experiment, Curvo et al [26] carried out joint irradiations of standard glasses, metallic monitors (Au and Co) and standard age samples. The recalibration of the thin films confirmed the previous calibration by Iunes et al [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the 238 U spontaneous fission decay constant) and the detection efficiencies are included into an empirical parameter Green 1982, 1983;Hurford 1990a, b). Thermal neutron fluence can be accurately measured by either metal-activation monitors (Van den haute et al 1988;de Corte et al 1991de Corte et al , 1995Enkelmann et al 2005;Curvo et al 2013) or standard glasses calibrated through uranium thin films Soares et al 2014a). The 238 U spontaneous fission decay constant was accurately determined by measurements of etched tracks in solid-state detectors (Hadler et al 1981;Guedes et al 2000Guedes et al , 2002Guedes et al , 2003aYoshioka et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%