2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48308-5_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Between Optimization Algorithms Applied to Offshore Crane Design Using an Online Crane Prototyping Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of GWO algorithm in terms of fitness value and convergence time compared to that of very well known optimization algorithms in literature such as GA, PSO, and SA for the same benchmark problem applied to the objective function given by Eq. (1) [8] is shown in Table III. Results from Table III show that the proposed GWO algorithm outperforms other algorithms in terms of stability, achieved fitness value and convergence time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of GWO algorithm in terms of fitness value and convergence time compared to that of very well known optimization algorithms in literature such as GA, PSO, and SA for the same benchmark problem applied to the objective function given by Eq. (1) [8] is shown in Table III. Results from Table III show that the proposed GWO algorithm outperforms other algorithms in terms of stability, achieved fitness value and convergence time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GUI also provides a simple visualization of the designed crane and its 2D workspace safe working load (SWL) chart [5]. Additionally, the MCOC uses various optimization algorithms for optimizing the design parameters in a manner that achieves the crane's desired design criteria [7][8]. Each KPI is typically related to overall performance, weight and cost of the designed crane.…”
Section: Offshore Crane Design Software Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations